Assessing risk among correctional community probation populations: predicting reoffense with mobile neurocognitive assessment software
Haarsma, Davenport et al (2019)
Quantifying the Prosecutorial Preauthorization Intake System and the Costs of ‘No Action’ Cases
(Ormachea, Davenport, Haarsma & Eagleman (2019)
The Role of Tablet-Based Psychological Tasks in Risk Assessment
Pablo A. Ormachea, Brian K. Lovins, David M. Eagleman, Sasha Davenport, Anna Jarman, Gabe Haarsma (2017). SAGE Journals.
Gendered Outcomes in Prostitution Arrests in Houston, Texas
Rebecca Pfeffer, Pablo Ormachea, David Eagleman
(2017) SAGE Journals.
The role of neuroscience in drug policy: Promises and prospects.
Ormachea PA, Savjani RR, DeLaGarza R, Eagleman DM (2016). Journal of Science and Law 2(1): 1-15.
Enabling individualized criminal sentencing while reducing subjectivity: a tablet-based assessment of recidivism risk.
Ormachea PA, Davenport S, Haarsma G, Jarman A, Henderson H, Eagleman DM (2016). AMA Journal of Ethics 18:243-251.
A new criminal records database for large scale analysis of policy and behavior.
Ormachea PA, Haarsma G, Davenport S, Eagleman DM (2015). Journal of Science and Law 1(1):1-7.
Intuitions of blameworthiness as a heuristic that evaluates the probability of the offender committing future antisocial acts.
Bumann B, Eagleman DM (2012). Thurgood Marshall Law Review. 36(2):129-155.
Defining a neurocompatibility index for systems of law.
In Law of the Future, Hague Institute for the Internationalisation of Law.
Legal-Ease: Is Neuroimaging a Valid Biomarker in Legal Cases?
Valeo T (2012). Neurology Today 12(8): 38-40.
Breivik's Brain.
Eagleman DM (2011). Published in NZZ am Sonntag (Switzerland), Politiken (Denmark), and The Independent (UK), Aug 2011.
The human brain: Turning our minds to the law.
Eagleman DM (2011). The Telegraph. Apr 5, 2011.
Why neuroscience matters for a rational drug policy.
Eagleman DM, Correro MA, Singh J (2010). Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology.